French ski resorts invested €555 million in 2025, matching last year's spend but masking a harder reality: the same money now buys less infrastructure as equipment costs outpace lift ticket prices and regulatory requirements multiply.
The Cost Squeeze Behind France's Headline Investment Figure
French ski resorts spent €555 million on infrastructure in 2025, essentially flat with the previous year and 50% above the decade average. On paper, that looks like continued strength. Dig into the data from Montagne Leaders magazine's annual survey—conducted with Atout France and Domaines Skiables de France—and the picture becomes more nuanced. The same investment now buys less infrastructure than it did five years ago.
The survey reveals that ski areas are allocating 32% of pre-tax turnover to capital projects, nine percentage points above the ten-year average. That's not necessarily because they're flush with cash—it's because equipment costs have risen faster than lift ticket prices. Between 2019 and 2025, the price of a new detachable chairlift outpaced revenue growth, forcing operators to devote a larger slice of turnover just to maintain their competitive position. Damien Zisswiller from Atout France's Mountain Delegation acknowledged the squeeze directly: sustaining this investment level now means "reconciling modernisation, diversification and financial balance" under mounting economic, regulatory, and climate pressures.
The €3.96 billion invested across French ski areas from 2016 through 2025 underpins an industry that recorded 54.7 million skier days last season—second globally—and generates roughly €12 billion in annual winter tourism spending. Over 120,000 jobs depend directly on lift operations each winter. So the investment isn't optional. The question is whether the current model remains sustainable as costs continue climbing.
New ski lifts absorbed €281 million—roughly half the total spend—across 48 installations. Here's what's changed: half of those were conveyor belts. That's a notable shift toward beginner infrastructure and customer diversification rather than high-capacity backbone lifts. The 24 "structural" lifts—gondolas, chairlifts, and surface installations—averaged €11 million each, driven partly by more gondola projects and associated base area construction. Gondolas cost more than chairlifts, and they require more building infrastructure at terminals.
The fastest-growing category wasn't lifts at all. Spending on reception buildings, mountain restaurants, welcome centres, and locker facilities hit €62 million—up 80% from the five-year average and 125% from the ten-year average. The industry frames this as "enhancing visitor experience," which translates to creating more opportunities to capture ancillary revenue. Food service, retail, and services now matter as much to the business model as vertical transport. It also supports the push toward year-round operations, though summer revenue still represents a fraction of winter earnings.
Maintenance and modernisation accounted for €71 million across more than 220 interventions in nearly 100 ski areas. That's less glamorous than new lifts but arguably more important—extending equipment lifespan directly affects operating margins and safety records. Anne Marty, President of Domaines Skiables de France, positioned this as operators "transforming their offerings" while optimising costs, which is accurate enough as far as it goes.
What's conspicuously absent: investment in artificial snow infrastructure has dropped significantly since the pandemic, even as France remains less equipped in snowmaking than Austria or Italy. Meanwhile, spending on diversification facilities—zip lines, four-season toboggans—increased 40% in 2025 compared to the previous four-year average. The signal is clear: operators are hedging against snow reliability issues by adding activities that don't require snowfall, rather than doubling down on snowmaking capacity.
Alpe dHuez ski resort in southern France.
Investment distribution reflects France's ski geography and commercial realities. Savoie led with €230 million, followed by Haute-Savoie at €84 million and Isère at €80 million—the three departments that contain most of France's major resorts. The Southern Alps received €72 million, the Pyrenees €35 million, and the smaller ranges (Massif Central, Jura, Vosges) collectively less than €8 million. These figures exclude grooming equipment, which would add several million more.
The concentration of investment in the northern Alps makes commercial sense—that's where skier visits and revenue concentrate—but it also means smaller resorts face structural disadvantages. They're dealing with the same cost inflation and regulatory requirements without comparable revenue bases. Some will adapt by focusing on local markets and affordability. Others will struggle.
The broader question is whether France's ski industry can sustain 32% of turnover going to capital investment indefinitely. That's a higher percentage than most industries maintain long-term, and it's driven partly by factors outside operators' control: equipment costs, regulatory requirements, climate adaptation needs. The €555 million headline figure suggests stability, but the underlying economics have shifted. Operators are running harder to stay in place.
France's position as the world's second-largest ski market by skier days provides some buffer—scale matters when negotiating equipment purchases and spreading fixed costs. But the trend lines point toward a future where maintaining current infrastructure levels requires either higher revenue (difficult in competitive markets) or more efficient operations. The increase in non-ski diversification spending suggests the industry knows relying solely on winter snow sports revenue isn't a viable long-term strategy. Whether the current investment pace proves sustainable will depend largely on factors—climate patterns, equipment costs, regulatory evolution—that individual operators can't control.
